Code Review Feedback:
The PR adds valuable E2E testing infrastructure, but there are several issues to address:
Critical Issues:
- **** - Playwright commands should run from directory.…
Code Review: Found several issues that need fixing:
- CI Config (.gitea/workflows/ci.yml:190-193): Missing working-directory for Playwright install step, and should use bunx instead of npx for…
Code Review
✅ Positive aspects:
- Good addition of Playwright e2e testing framework
- Proper dependency management and configuration
- Appropriate .gitignore additions for test…
Code Review Findings
✅ Positive Changes:
- Removes unimplemented Apple Pay references
- Updates footer links to actual game routes
- Removes confusing support disclaimer
- Consolidates…
Code Review - Approve with Minor Suggestions
The changes successfully address frontend inconsistencies and improve navigation. Good work on:
✅ Fixed routing: Updated footer links from…
Code Review Summary
The changes improve frontend consistency by updating navigation links and cleaning up UI elements. Most changes are good, but there's one issue to address:
Issues:
- …
Code Review
✅ Frontend Changes Look Good
The routing fix in is correct and properly addresses the lootbox navigation issue by moving the opening route from a child route to a sibling…
Code Review - README Updates
✅ Positive Aspects
- Comprehensive documentation improvements for both backend and frontend
- Better structure with logical flow from overview to technical…
Code Review for PR #280
Overall this is a great improvement to the documentation, transforming it from German to English and adding comprehensive details. However, there are a few minor…
Code Review for PR #279 - Fix: Invalid Pipe Argument
Summary: This PR fixes the date pipe format in two HTML template files by changing 'Y' to 'y' in the date format string.
**Changes…
Code Review Summary: Good addition for automated PR labeling! However, there are a few issues that need attention. Issues: 1) labeler.yml line 3 - Incorrect trigger syntax, should use object…
Code Review Summary
Good addition for automated PR labeling! However, there are a few issues that need attention:
Issues:
- **** - Incorrect trigger syntax. Should use object format: …
Code Review Results
Critical Issue Found:
** lines 13-15:** The stale-pr-message contains highly inappropriate and unprofessional language that is completely unacceptable in a professional…
Code Review for PR #253: chore: Add stale pipeline
I've reviewed the changes in and found several significant issues that need to be addressed:
Critical Issues:
- **Line 12 -…
The workflow configuration looks good overall, but there are some issues that need to be addressed:
Critical Issue:
- Line 12: The stale-pr-message contains unprofessional language that's…
Code Review Feedback
This PR has a critical issue that must be addressed before merging:
❌ Critical Issue:
- **Line 11 in **: The stale-pr-message contains inappropriate and offensive…
Code Review for PR #253
Summary: Adding a stale pipeline workflow to automatically handle stale issues and PRs.
Issues Found:
- **** - The stale messages are using placeholder text…
Code Review Approved ✅
This PR successfully simplifies the Claude workflow by replacing ~70 lines of complex setup with a reusable action.
Positive aspects:
- Significant improvement…
Code Review
I've reviewed the changes in this PR. Overall, the workflow file is well-structured and follows good practices. Here are my observations:
✅ Positive aspects:
- Clean…