docs: add deployment docs #311

Merged
ptran merged 1 commit from docs/deployment into main 2025-06-11 12:22:28 +00:00
Owner
No description provided.
csimonis added 1 commit 2025-06-11 12:17:14 +00:00
docs: add deployment docs
All checks were successful
Claude PR Review / claude-code (pull_request) Successful in 1m12s
Pull Request Labeler / labeler (pull_request_target) Successful in 5s
CI / Get Changed Files (pull_request) Successful in 9s
CI / Backend Tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / eslint (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / Checkstyle Main (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / oxlint (pull_request) Has been skipped
Label PRs based on size / Check PR size (pull_request) Successful in 12s
CI / Docker frontend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / prettier (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / Docker backend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / test-build (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / Playwright (pull_request) Has been skipped
f26d4d338b
forgejo-actions added the
size
small
label 2025-06-11 12:17:33 +00:00
Collaborator

Code Review Issues Found:

Major Concerns:

  1. Unrelated content removal: The PR removes the entire Slots.tex file (57 lines) without explanation. This seems unrelated to adding deployment docs and might be accidental.

Documentation Issues:

projektdokumentation/Inhalt/Deployment.tex:

  • Line 3: Grammar - consider more formal phrasing
  • Line 5: 'Lokal' should be lowercase 'lokal'
  • Line 6: Very long run-on sentence, consider breaking it up for readability
  • Line 5: Personal reference 'bei Constantin' might not be appropriate for formal documentation
  • Line 6: Verify that API acronym is properly defined in acronyms file

projektdokumentation/.gitignore:

  • Line 132: Missing newline at end of file

Suggestions:

  • Consider splitting the long sentence in line 6 into multiple sentences
  • Review if the Slots.tex removal was intentional
  • Add newline at end of .gitignore file

The deployment documentation content itself is useful and well-structured with proper LaTeX formatting.

**Code Review Issues Found:** ## Major Concerns: 1. **Unrelated content removal**: The PR removes the entire Slots.tex file (57 lines) without explanation. This seems unrelated to adding deployment docs and might be accidental. ## Documentation Issues: **projektdokumentation/Inhalt/Deployment.tex:** - Line 3: Grammar - consider more formal phrasing - Line 5: 'Lokal' should be lowercase 'lokal' - Line 6: Very long run-on sentence, consider breaking it up for readability - Line 5: Personal reference 'bei Constantin' might not be appropriate for formal documentation - Line 6: Verify that API acronym is properly defined in acronyms file **projektdokumentation/.gitignore:** - Line 132: Missing newline at end of file ## Suggestions: - Consider splitting the long sentence in line 6 into multiple sentences - Review if the Slots.tex removal was intentional - Add newline at end of .gitignore file The deployment documentation content itself is useful and well-structured with proper LaTeX formatting.
jank closed this pull request 2025-06-11 12:18:44 +00:00
csimonis reopened this pull request 2025-06-11 12:19:07 +00:00
csimonis force-pushed docs/deployment from f26d4d338b to 52a3e6aadc 2025-06-11 12:21:06 +00:00 Compare
ptran approved these changes 2025-06-11 12:22:16 +00:00
ptran merged commit a411234714 into main 2025-06-11 12:22:28 +00:00
ptran deleted branch docs/deployment 2025-06-11 12:22:28 +00:00
Collaborator

Code Review

Overall Assessment: This PR adds valuable deployment documentation to the project. The structure is good and follows existing LaTeX patterns.

Issues to address:

  1. Grammar error in : Missing comma after 'Server' - should be 'Es gibt zwei Server, auf denen Instanzen der Applikation laufen'

  2. Readability in : The second bullet point sentence is very long and could be split for better readability

  3. File formatting in : Missing newline at end of file

Suggestions for improvement:

  • Consider adding more technical details about the actual deployment process
  • Information about CI/CD pipeline or update procedures would be valuable

The documentation provides a good foundation for understanding the deployment infrastructure. With the minor fixes above, this will be a solid addition to the project documentation.

## Code Review **Overall Assessment:** This PR adds valuable deployment documentation to the project. The structure is good and follows existing LaTeX patterns. **Issues to address:** 1. **Grammar error** in : Missing comma after 'Server' - should be 'Es gibt zwei Server, auf denen Instanzen der Applikation laufen' 2. **Readability** in : The second bullet point sentence is very long and could be split for better readability 3. **File formatting** in : Missing newline at end of file **Suggestions for improvement:** - Consider adding more technical details about the actual deployment process - Information about CI/CD pipeline or update procedures would be valuable The documentation provides a good foundation for understanding the deployment infrastructure. With the minor fixes above, this will be a solid addition to the project documentation.
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
No reviewers
No milestone
No project
No assignees
3 participants
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SZUT/casino#311
No description provided.