chore: Add docs for coinflip #309
No reviewers
Labels
No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
backend
ci
docs
frontend
lgtm
blocked
lgtm
done
lgtm
need 1
size
huge
size
large
size
medium
size
small
No milestone
No project
No assignees
4 participants
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: SZUT/casino#309
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/coinflip"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Code Review - Issues Found
Issues that need to be addressed:
projektdokumentation/.gitignore (line 9): Removing from .gitignore will track compiled PDF files in git, which can cause merge conflicts and repository bloat. Consider keeping PDF files ignored.
projektdokumentation/Abkuerzungen.tex (lines 38-39): Removing and acronym definitions may break references to these terms elsewhere in the documentation.
projektdokumentation/Inhalt.tex (line 6): Completely replacing Auth.tex with Coinflip.tex removes authentication documentation. Consider adding coinflip documentation alongside existing content rather than replacing it.
projektdokumentation/Projektdokumentation.pdf: This compiled PDF shouldn't be tracked in version control - it will be generated during builds.
Positive aspects:
Recommendation: Please address the documentation structure issues and avoid tracking compiled files in git.
095d7497b4
to87066919d4
Code Review for PR #309: Add docs for coinflip
Positive aspects:
Issues and suggestions:
projektdokumentation/Inhalt/Coinflip.tex:
Line 39: Missing trailing backslash at the end of the file. The file should end with to maintain consistency with LaTeX formatting.
Lines 10-11: Inconsistent sentence structure. Line 10 ends with a period followed by a space, while line 11 starts immediately. Consider combining these sentences or reformatting for better flow.
Line 19: Minor terminology inconsistency. \Münzbetrag\ (coin amount) should be \Geldbetrag\ (money amount) to match the actual implementation where players bet with currency, not coins.
Content accuracy: The documentation accurately describes the implementation details and game flow, which is commendable.
projektdokumentation/Inhalt.tex:
Line 7: Good reordering of the includes to maintain logical flow (Auth before Dice, then Coinflip).
Line 8: Extra blank line is acceptable for readability.
Minor suggestions:
Overall, this is a solid documentation addition that maintains consistency with the existing codebase documentation style and provides clear, accurate information about the Coinflip game implementation.
87066919d4
to050c272226
New commits pushed, approval review dismissed automatically according to repository settings
The documentation for Coinflip is well-written and comprehensive. However, there are two minor issues:
The content itself is excellent - it follows the same structure and quality as the existing game documentation, provides comprehensive coverage of the game mechanics, and maintains consistency with the German language used throughout the project. The reorganization of the include order in Inhalt.tex also makes sense for logical flow.
Overall this is a solid documentation addition with just minor formatting issues to address.