SZUT/casino

Archived

Fork 0

chore: Add Project-Architecture #306

Merged

ptran merged 1 commit from docs/architecture into main

2025-06-11 11:53:11 +00:00

jank commented

2025-06-11 11:48:57 +00:00

Owner

No description provided.

jank added 1 commit 2025-06-11 11:48:58 +00:00

chore: Add Project-Architecture

CI / Get Changed Files (pull_request) Successful in 10s

Details

Pull Request Labeler / labeler (pull_request_target) Successful in 4s

Details

CI / Backend Tests (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / Checkstyle Main (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / eslint (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / oxlint (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / Docker frontend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

Label PRs based on size / Check PR size (pull_request) Successful in 13s

Details

CI / prettier (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / Docker backend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / test-build (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

CI / Playwright (pull_request) Has been skipped

Details

Claude PR Review / claude-code (pull_request) Successful in 1m20s

Details

9197f99344

forgejo-actions added the

size

small

label 2025-06-11 11:49:16 +00:00

jank force-pushed docs/architecture from 9197f99344 to 0345df3a30

2025-06-11 11:49:16 +00:00

Compare

Claude commented

2025-06-11 11:50:17 +00:00

Collaborator

Code Review for PR #306: Add Project-Architecture

Overview

This PR adds comprehensive project architecture documentation to the project. The changes are well-structured and provide valuable documentation for future developers.

Positive Aspects

Well-structured documentation: The new file provides a thorough overview of the system architecture
Proper LaTeX formatting: Correct use of sections, subsections, and LaTeX commands
Comprehensive coverage: Covers frontend, backend, data architecture, and deployment strategy
Proper integration: The new section is properly integrated into the main document structure

Minor Issues Found

projektdokumentation/Inhalt/Projektarchitektur.tex

Line 40: The paragraph is quite long and could benefit from being split into multiple paragraphs for better readability. Consider breaking it after ...parallel zu arbeiten, ohne sich gegenseitig zu blockieren.\

.claude/settings.local.json

Line 8: Missing newline at end of file. This is a minor formatting issue but should be consistent with project standards.

Suggestions for Improvement

Consistency: The documentation is written in German, which is consistent with other parts of the project documentation
Technical accuracy: The technology stack descriptions are accurate and well-explained
Structure: The logical flow from overview to specific implementations is well-organized

Overall Assessment

This is a solid contribution that adds valuable documentation to the project. The architecture description is comprehensive and will help new developers understand the system design. The technical content is accurate and well-presented.

Recommendation: Approve with minor formatting improvements suggested above.

## Code Review for PR #306: Add Project-Architecture ### Overview This PR adds comprehensive project architecture documentation to the project. The changes are well-structured and provide valuable documentation for future developers. ### Positive Aspects - **Well-structured documentation**: The new file provides a thorough overview of the system architecture - **Proper LaTeX formatting**: Correct use of sections, subsections, and LaTeX commands - **Comprehensive coverage**: Covers frontend, backend, data architecture, and deployment strategy - **Proper integration**: The new section is properly integrated into the main document structure ### Minor Issues Found #### projektdokumentation/Inhalt/Projektarchitektur.tex - **Line 40**: The paragraph is quite long and could benefit from being split into multiple paragraphs for better readability. Consider breaking it after \...parallel zu arbeiten, ohne sich gegenseitig zu blockieren.\ #### .claude/settings.local.json - **Line 8**: Missing newline at end of file. This is a minor formatting issue but should be consistent with project standards. ### Suggestions for Improvement 1. **Consistency**: The documentation is written in German, which is consistent with other parts of the project documentation 2. **Technical accuracy**: The technology stack descriptions are accurate and well-explained 3. **Structure**: The logical flow from overview to specific implementations is well-organized ### Overall Assessment This is a solid contribution that adds valuable documentation to the project. The architecture description is comprehensive and will help new developers understand the system design. The technical content is accurate and well-presented. **Recommendation**: Approve with minor formatting improvements suggested above.

Claude commented

2025-06-11 11:50:32 +00:00

Collaborator

Code review completed. This PR adds comprehensive project architecture documentation in German to the LaTeX project documentation.

Positive aspects:

Well-structured LaTeX documentation following proper conventions
Comprehensive coverage of frontend, backend, data architecture, and deployment
Accurate reflection of the actual technology stack used
Proper use of footnotes and sectioning

Minor suggestions:

Line 18 in Projektarchitektur.tex: The PostgreSQL sentence ends abruptly - consider adding context about why it was chosen
Line 40: The deployment section could benefit from a concluding sentence

The changes are well-written and provide valuable architectural context. The API acronym uncomment in Abkuerzungen.tex and proper inclusion in Inhalt.tex are correctly implemented.

Code review completed. This PR adds comprehensive project architecture documentation in German to the LaTeX project documentation. **Positive aspects:** - Well-structured LaTeX documentation following proper conventions - Comprehensive coverage of frontend, backend, data architecture, and deployment - Accurate reflection of the actual technology stack used - Proper use of footnotes and sectioning **Minor suggestions:** - Line 18 in Projektarchitektur.tex: The PostgreSQL sentence ends abruptly - consider adding context about why it was chosen - Line 40: The deployment section could benefit from a concluding sentence The changes are well-written and provide valuable architectural context. The API acronym uncomment in Abkuerzungen.tex and proper inclusion in Inhalt.tex are correctly implemented.