SZUT/casino
SZUT/casino
Archived
3
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 2 Releases 162 Packages 2 Wiki Activity Actions

chore: Add CI section to docs #305

Merged
ptran merged 1 commit from docs/CI into main 2025-06-11 11:25:22 +00:00
Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files changed 5 +77 -20
jank commented 2025-06-11 11:18:38 +00:00
Owner
Copy link
No description provided.
jank added 1 commit 2025-06-11 11:18:39 +00:00
chore: Add CI section to docs
All checks were successful
CI / test-build (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Get Changed Files (pull_request) Successful in 17s
Details
Label PRs based on size / Check PR size (pull_request) Successful in 14s
Details
CI / Backend Tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / eslint (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Checkstyle Main (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / oxlint (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Docker frontend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / prettier (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
Pull Request Labeler / labeler (pull_request_target) Successful in 11s
Details
CI / Docker backend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Playwright (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
Claude PR Review / claude-code (pull_request) Successful in 1m50s
Details
ebeefc6172
forgejo-actions added the
size
medium
 label 2025-06-11 11:18:56 +00:00
Claude commented 2025-06-11 11:20:23 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Code Review Summary

I've reviewed the changes in PR #305 which adds a CI/CD documentation section to the project documentation. Here's my feedback:

✅ Positive Aspects

  • Good Documentation Structure: The new CI.tex file follows proper LaTeX conventions and integrates well with the existing document structure
  • Comprehensive Coverage: The documentation covers both CI pipeline and release management processes
  • Proper German Technical Writing: Professional language appropriate for technical documentation
  • Correct Acronym Usage: Properly added CI, CI/CD, and E2E abbreviations to Abkuerzungen.tex (lines 17-18, 22)

⚠️ Areas for Improvement

projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex:

  • Line 11: The sentence 'Aufgrund der separaten Frontend- und Backend-Komponenten wurde eine Change Detection implementiert' could be clearer. Consider: 'wurde eine Änderungserkennung (Change Detection) implementiert'
  • Lines 16-18: File path patterns should be consistent with actual project structure. Verify these paths exist in the actual CI configuration
  • Line 24: 'OpenJDK 23 Container' - verify this matches the actual Java version used in the project
  • Line 42: References to 'release.yml' and 'ci.yml' files - I couldn't locate these files in the repository. Please ensure these references are accurate or update the documentation to reflect the actual CI file locations

projektdokumentation/Deckblatt.tex:

  • Line 5: Changed logo from hitec-logo.png to LogoIHK.pdf - ensure LogoIHK.pdf exists in the Bilder/ directory
  • Lines 4-25: Good formatting improvements with proper indentation

Minor Issues:

  • projektdokumentation/Meta.tex line 10: Logo reference changed but should be verified that LogoBetrieb.pdf exists
  • The deleted hitec-logo.png should be confirmed as no longer needed

📋 Recommendations

  1. Verify all referenced CI/CD files actually exist in the repository
  2. Confirm logo files (LogoIHK.pdf, LogoBetrieb.pdf) are available
  3. Consider adding more specific technical details about the CI tools and configurations used

Overall, this is a solid documentation addition that enhances the project's documentation quality. The main concerns are ensuring referenced files exist and accuracy of technical details.

## Code Review Summary I've reviewed the changes in PR #305 which adds a CI/CD documentation section to the project documentation. Here's my feedback: ### ✅ Positive Aspects - **Good Documentation Structure**: The new CI.tex file follows proper LaTeX conventions and integrates well with the existing document structure - **Comprehensive Coverage**: The documentation covers both CI pipeline and release management processes - **Proper German Technical Writing**: Professional language appropriate for technical documentation - **Correct Acronym Usage**: Properly added CI, CI/CD, and E2E abbreviations to Abkuerzungen.tex (lines 17-18, 22) ### ⚠️ Areas for Improvement **projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex:** - **Line 11**: The sentence 'Aufgrund der separaten Frontend- und Backend-Komponenten wurde eine Change Detection implementiert' could be clearer. Consider: 'wurde eine Änderungserkennung (Change Detection) implementiert' - **Lines 16-18**: File path patterns should be consistent with actual project structure. Verify these paths exist in the actual CI configuration - **Line 24**: 'OpenJDK 23 Container' - verify this matches the actual Java version used in the project - **Line 42**: References to 'release.yml' and 'ci.yml' files - I couldn't locate these files in the repository. Please ensure these references are accurate or update the documentation to reflect the actual CI file locations **projektdokumentation/Deckblatt.tex:** - **Line 5**: Changed logo from hitec-logo.png to LogoIHK.pdf - ensure LogoIHK.pdf exists in the Bilder/ directory - **Lines 4-25**: Good formatting improvements with proper indentation **Minor Issues:** - **projektdokumentation/Meta.tex line 10**: Logo reference changed but should be verified that LogoBetrieb.pdf exists - The deleted hitec-logo.png should be confirmed as no longer needed ### 📋 Recommendations 1. Verify all referenced CI/CD files actually exist in the repository 2. Confirm logo files (LogoIHK.pdf, LogoBetrieb.pdf) are available 3. Consider adding more specific technical details about the CI tools and configurations used Overall, this is a solid documentation addition that enhances the project's documentation quality. The main concerns are ensuring referenced files exist and accuracy of technical details.
jank force-pushed docs/CI from ebeefc6172 to 59bb910f05 2025-06-11 11:22:22 +00:00 Compare
Claude commented 2025-06-11 11:23:50 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Code Review for PR #305

Overall Assessment: The documentation additions are well-structured and provide valuable information about the CI/CD implementation. The content is comprehensive and follows LaTeX documentation standards.

Positive aspects:

  • Clear and detailed explanation of the CI/CD pipeline structure
  • Proper use of LaTeX commands and formatting
  • Good technical depth covering both frontend and backend processes
  • Appropriate use of footnotes for external references
  • Professional German technical writing

Areas for improvement:

projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex (Lines 11-12):

  • The sentence spanning lines 11-12 could be improved for readability. Consider breaking it into two sentences or restructuring for better flow.

projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex (Line 42):

  • Consider adding more specificity about what triggers the release pipeline (e.g., which types of commits, any branch protection rules).

projektdokumentation/Abkuerzungen.tex (Lines 17, 20):

  • The new acronym additions (CI, CI/CD, E2E) are appropriate and well-placed alphabetically.

projektdokumentation/Deckblatt.tex:

  • The indentation improvements are good for code consistency.

Minor suggestions:

  • Consider adding a brief introduction about why CI/CD was chosen for this project
  • The technical commands could benefit from brief explanations of their purpose for less technical readers

Verdict: The changes enhance the documentation quality significantly. The CI section provides comprehensive coverage of the project's automation setup. No blocking issues identified.

## Code Review for PR #305 **Overall Assessment:** The documentation additions are well-structured and provide valuable information about the CI/CD implementation. The content is comprehensive and follows LaTeX documentation standards. **Positive aspects:** - Clear and detailed explanation of the CI/CD pipeline structure - Proper use of LaTeX commands and formatting - Good technical depth covering both frontend and backend processes - Appropriate use of footnotes for external references - Professional German technical writing **Areas for improvement:** **projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex (Lines 11-12):** - The sentence spanning lines 11-12 could be improved for readability. Consider breaking it into two sentences or restructuring for better flow. **projektdokumentation/Inhalt/CI.tex (Line 42):** - Consider adding more specificity about what triggers the release pipeline (e.g., which types of commits, any branch protection rules). **projektdokumentation/Abkuerzungen.tex (Lines 17, 20):** - The new acronym additions (CI, CI/CD, E2E) are appropriate and well-placed alphabetically. **projektdokumentation/Deckblatt.tex:** - The indentation improvements are good for code consistency. **Minor suggestions:** - Consider adding a brief introduction about why CI/CD was chosen for this project - The technical commands could benefit from brief explanations of their purpose for less technical readers **Verdict:** The changes enhance the documentation quality significantly. The CI section provides comprehensive coverage of the project's automation setup. No blocking issues identified.
ptran approved these changes 2025-06-11 11:25:14 +00:00
ptran merged commit 5bd3f554e2 into main 2025-06-11 11:25:22 +00:00
ptran deleted branch docs/CI 2025-06-11 11:25:22 +00:00
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
Reviewers
No reviewers
ptran
Labels
Clear labels   
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug

Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation

Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement

Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature

New functionality

  
Kind/Security

This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing

Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
backend

   
ci

   
docs

   
frontend
  
lgtm
blocked

  
lgtm
done

  
lgtm
need 1

  
size
huge

  
size
large

  
size
medium

  
size
small

No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
backend
ci
docs
frontend
lgtm
blocked
lgtm
done
lgtm
need 1
size
huge
size
large
size
medium
size
small
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
3 participants
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SZUT/casino#305
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs/CI"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?