SZUT/casino
SZUT/casino
Archived
3
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests 2 Releases 162 Packages 2 Wiki Activity Actions

docs: add docs #301

Merged
jank merged 1 commit from docs into main 2025-06-11 10:28:05 +00:00
Conversation 3 Commits 1 Files changed 80 +4490
ptran commented 2025-06-11 10:24:40 +00:00
Member
Copy link
No description provided.
ptran added 1 commit 2025-06-11 10:24:40 +00:00
docs: add docs
All checks were successful
CI / Get Changed Files (pull_request) Successful in 30s
Details
Pull Request Labeler / labeler (pull_request_target) Successful in 15s
Details
CI / Backend Tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
Label PRs based on size / Check PR size (pull_request) Successful in 29s
Details
CI / eslint (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Checkstyle Main (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / oxlint (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Docker frontend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / prettier (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Docker backend validation (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / test-build (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
CI / Playwright (pull_request) Has been skipped
Details
Claude PR Review / claude-code (pull_request) Successful in 1m42s
Details
9cb813bf41
forgejo-actions commented 2025-06-11 10:25:13 +00:00
Copy link

👮‍♀️🛑 This PR's diff size is quite huge. Hopefully you know what you're doing. If you did not commit a lot of autogenerated files intentionally, there are few good reasons for this.

👮‍♀️🛑 This PR's diff size is quite huge. Hopefully you know what you're doing. If you did not commit a lot of autogenerated files intentionally, there are few good reasons for this.
forgejo-actions added the
size
huge
 label 2025-06-11 10:25:13 +00:00
Claude commented 2025-06-11 10:26:21 +00:00
Collaborator
Copy link

Code Review for PR #301: docs: add docs

This PR adds a comprehensive LaTeX project documentation template with 80 new files. Here are my findings:

Overall Assessment

The addition appears to be a complete German LaTeX documentation template, likely for academic/professional project documentation following DIN standards.

Issues Found:

1. IDE-specific files committed (projektdokumentation/.project, .texlipse)

  • These Eclipse TeXlipse IDE configuration files should typically be gitignored
  • Consider removing these from the repository and adding them to .gitignore

2. Generated PDF committed (projektdokumentation/Projektdokumentation.pdf)

  • Binary files like PDFs should generally not be committed to repositories
  • Consider adding *.pdf to .gitignore and documenting the build process instead

3. Missing documentation

  • No explanation in commit message or README about what this documentation template is for
  • Consider adding a brief description of the template's purpose

4. File organization looks appropriate

  • Well-structured LaTeX project with proper separation of concerns
  • Appropriate use of .gitignore for LaTeX auxiliary files
  • Good separation between content, styling, and configuration

Recommendations:

  1. Remove IDE-specific files (.project, .texlipse)
  2. Remove generated PDF file
  3. Add documentation explaining the template's purpose
  4. Consider whether this large template addition aligns with the project's goals

The code structure itself appears well-organized for a LaTeX documentation template, but the inclusion of generated files and IDE configurations should be addressed.

## Code Review for PR #301: docs: add docs This PR adds a comprehensive LaTeX project documentation template with 80 new files. Here are my findings: ### Overall Assessment The addition appears to be a complete German LaTeX documentation template, likely for academic/professional project documentation following DIN standards. ### Issues Found: **1. IDE-specific files committed (projektdokumentation/.project, .texlipse)** - These Eclipse TeXlipse IDE configuration files should typically be gitignored - Consider removing these from the repository and adding them to .gitignore **2. Generated PDF committed (projektdokumentation/Projektdokumentation.pdf)** - Binary files like PDFs should generally not be committed to repositories - Consider adding *.pdf to .gitignore and documenting the build process instead **3. Missing documentation** - No explanation in commit message or README about what this documentation template is for - Consider adding a brief description of the template's purpose **4. File organization looks appropriate** - Well-structured LaTeX project with proper separation of concerns - Appropriate use of .gitignore for LaTeX auxiliary files - Good separation between content, styling, and configuration ### Recommendations: 1. Remove IDE-specific files (.project, .texlipse) 2. Remove generated PDF file 3. Add documentation explaining the template's purpose 4. Consider whether this large template addition aligns with the project's goals The code structure itself appears well-organized for a LaTeX documentation template, but the inclusion of generated files and IDE configurations should be addressed.
jank approved these changes 2025-06-11 10:27:57 +00:00
jank merged commit fad280104d into main 2025-06-11 10:28:05 +00:00
jank deleted branch docs 2025-06-11 10:28:05 +00:00
Commenting is not possible because the repository is archived.
Reviewers
No reviewers
jank
Labels
Clear labels   
Compat/Breaking

Breaking change that won't be backward compatible

  
Kind/Bug

Something is not working

  
Kind/Documentation

Documentation changes

  
Kind/Enhancement

Improve existing functionality

  
Kind/Feature

New functionality

  
Kind/Security

This is security issue

  
Kind/Testing

Issue or pull request related to testing

  
Priority
Critical
The priority is critical

  
Priority
High
The priority is high

  
Priority
Low
The priority is low

  
Priority
Medium
The priority is medium

  
Reviewed
Confirmed
Issue has been confirmed

  
Reviewed
Duplicate
This issue or pull request already exists

  
Reviewed
Invalid
Invalid issue

  
Reviewed
Won't Fix
This issue won't be fixed

  
Status
Abandoned
Somebody has started to work on this but abandoned work

  
Status
Blocked
Something is blocking this issue or pull request

  
Status
Need More Info
Feedback is required to reproduce issue or to continue work

  
backend

   
ci

   
docs

   
frontend
  
lgtm
blocked

  
lgtm
done

  
lgtm
need 1

  
size
huge

  
size
large

  
size
medium

  
size
small

No labels
Compat/Breaking
Kind/Bug
Kind/Documentation
Kind/Enhancement
Kind/Feature
Kind/Security
Kind/Testing
Priority
Critical
Priority
High
Priority
Low
Priority
Medium
Reviewed
Confirmed
Reviewed
Duplicate
Reviewed
Invalid
Reviewed
Won't Fix
Status
Abandoned
Status
Blocked
Status
Need More Info
backend
ci
docs
frontend
lgtm
blocked
lgtm
done
lgtm
need 1
size
huge
size
large
size
medium
size
small
Milestone
Clear milestone
No items
No milestone
Projects
Clear projects
No items
No project
Assignees
Clear assignees
No assignees
4 participants
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference: SZUT/casino#301
No description provided.
Delete branch "docs"

Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?