feat: Add claude code review #226

Merged

jank merged 1 commit from claude into main

2025-05-28 08:44:54 +00:00

jank commented

2025-05-28 08:42:09 +00:00

Owner

No description provided.

jank added 1 commit 2025-05-28 08:42:09 +00:00

feat: Add claude code review

CI / Get Changed Files (pull_request) Successful in 8s

Details

CI / oxlint (pull_request) Successful in 1m0s

Details

CI / prettier (pull_request) Successful in 1m9s

Details

CI / eslint (pull_request) Successful in 1m13s

Details

Setup Gitea Tea CLI / setup-and-login (pull_request) Successful in 1m31s

Details

CI / test-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m23s

Details

CI / Docker frontend validation (pull_request) Successful in 1m27s

Details

CI / Docker backend validation (pull_request) Successful in 1m26s

Details

CI / Checkstyle Main (pull_request) Successful in 1m34s

Details

52d9e7b688

Claude commented

2025-05-28 08:43:37 +00:00

Collaborator

Code review completed. While the workflow structure is good, there are several critical issues that need to be addressed:

Security Issue: Line 44 has flawed logic for the --insecure flag. The expression ${{ startsWith(secrets._GITEA_URL, 'http://') || '' }} will always evaluate to truthy, making all connections insecure even for HTTPS URLs.
Platform Inconsistency: The workflow uses GitHub Actions syntax (${{ github.event.number }}) but is in .gitea/workflows/. This should be clarified and placed in the correct directory.
Potential Command Injection: The tea command construction could be vulnerable if PR numbers contain unexpected characters.

Recommendations:

Fix the --insecure flag logic to properly check for HTTP vs HTTPS
Clarify target platform (GitHub vs Gitea) and place file accordingly
Add job timeout for resource management
Consider security implications of command construction

Please address these issues before merging.

Recommendation: Reject until security issues are resolved.

Code review completed. While the workflow structure is good, there are several critical issues that need to be addressed: 1. **Security Issue**: Line 44 has flawed logic for the --insecure flag. The expression `${{ startsWith(secrets._GITEA_URL, 'http://') || '' }}` will always evaluate to truthy, making all connections insecure even for HTTPS URLs. 2. **Platform Inconsistency**: The workflow uses GitHub Actions syntax (`${{ github.event.number }}`) but is in .gitea/workflows/. This should be clarified and placed in the correct directory. 3. **Potential Command Injection**: The tea command construction could be vulnerable if PR numbers contain unexpected characters. Recommendations: - Fix the --insecure flag logic to properly check for HTTP vs HTTPS - Clarify target platform (GitHub vs Gitea) and place file accordingly - Add job timeout for resource management - Consider security implications of command construction Please address these issues before merging. **Recommendation: Reject** until security issues are resolved.

jank scheduled this pull request to auto merge when all checks succeed 2025-05-28 08:44:52 +00:00