Michael Jerger 9ea796b9ab [gitea] week 2025-21 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo) (#8040) ... ## Checklist - [x] go to the last cherry-pick PR (forgejo/forgejo#7965) to figure out how far it went: [gitea@9d4ebc1f2c](9d4ebc1f2c) - [x] cherry-pick and open PR (forgejo/forgejo#8040) - [ ] have the PR pass the CI - end-to-end (specially important if there are actions related changes) - [ ] add `run-end-to-end` label - [ ] check the result - [ ] write release notes - [ ] assign reviewers - [ ] 48h later, last call - merge 1 hour after the last call ## Legend - ❓ - No decision about the commit has been made. - 🍒 - The commit has been cherry picked. - ⏩ - The commit has been skipped. - 💡 - The commit has been skipped, but should be ported to Forgejo. - ✍️ - The commit has been skipped, and a port to Forgejo already exists. ## Commits - 🍒 [`gitea`](50d9565088) -> [`forgejo`](c3e6eab732) Add sort option recentclose for issues and pulls ([gitea#34525](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34525)) ## TODO - 💡 [`gitea`](d5bbaee64e) Retain issue sort type when a keyword search is introduced ([gitea#34559](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34559)) UI: Small bat might be nice. Test needed? Do we've frontend tests covering the search? ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](82ea2387e4) Always use an empty line to separate the commit message and trailer ([gitea#34512](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34512)) Needs merge ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](74858dc5ae) Fix line-button issue after file selection in file tree ([gitea#34574](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34574)) Frontend: Makes it sense to pick/port ui logic in *.ts files? ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](7149c9c55d) Fix doctor deleting orphaned issues attachments ([gitea#34142](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34142)) Doctor: seems useful. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](0cec4b84e2) Fix actions skipped commit status indicator ([gitea#34507](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34507)) Actions: Might benefit from additional tests. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](4cb0c641ce) Add "View workflow file" to Actions list page ([gitea#34538](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34538)) Actions: Needs tests ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](b0936f4f41) Do not mutate incoming options to RenderUserSearch and SearchUsers ([gitea#34544](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34544)) Nice refactoring but needs manual merge. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](498088c053) Add webhook assigning test and fix possible bug ([gitea#34420](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34420)) Integrationtest has conflicts needs merge. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](24a51059d7) Fix possible nil description of pull request when migrating from CodeCommit ([gitea#34541](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34541)) Is this relevant to forgejo? Did not find the place to apply this small change. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](688da55f54) Split GetLatestCommitStatus as two functions ([gitea#34535](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34535)) Merge required. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](ab9691291d) Don't display error log when .git-blame-ignore-revs doesn't exist ([gitea#34457](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34457)) Unsure wheter this affects forgejo. Tests missing. ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](11ee7ff3bf) fix: return 201 Created for CreateVariable API responses ([gitea#34517](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34517)) Actions: This is marked as breaking the api. Pls think about whether this breaking change iss needed & how this impact api-version-increase. The corresponding clinet change can be found here: https://gitea.com/gitea/go-sdk/pulls/713/files ------ - 💡 [`gitea`](9b295e984a) Actions list ([gitea#34530](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34530)) Actions: Regression from https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34337 Part of https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/7909 ------ ## Skipped - ⏩ [`gitea`](bb6377d080) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin ------ - ⏩ [`gitea`](07d802a815) [skip ci] Updated translations via Crowdin ------ - ⏩ [`gitea`](c6e2093f42) Clean up "file-view" related styles ([gitea#34558](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34558)) - gitea ui specific specific ------ - ⏩ [`gitea`](9f10885b21) Refactor commit reader ([gitea#34542](https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/34542)) - gitea refactor specific ------ <details> <summary><h2>Stats</h2></summary> <br> Between [`gitea@9d4ebc1f2c`](9d4ebc1f2c) and [`gitea@d5bbaee64e`](d5bbaee64e), **18** commits have been reviewed. We picked **1**, skipped **4**, and decided to port **13**. </details> Co-authored-by: Markus Amshove <scm@amshove.org> Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8040 Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org> Co-authored-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de> Co-committed-by: Michael Jerger <michael.jerger@meissa-gmbh.de>		2025-06-16 20:27:47 +02:00
..
forgejo-ui.tmpl	s/return_to_gitea/return_to_forgejo (#3822)	2024-05-20 18:44:33 +00:00
ui.tmpl	s/return_to_gitea/return_to_forgejo (#3822)	2024-05-20 18:44:33 +00:00
v1_json.tmpl	[gitea] week 2025-21 cherry pick (gitea/main -> forgejo) (#8040)	2025-06-16 20:27:47 +02:00