For pull request templates, Forgejo currently does not look in the `docs` directory, but [GitHub does](https://docs.github.com/en/communities/using-templates-to-encourage-useful-issues-and-pull-requests/creating-a-pull-request-template-for-your-repository#adding-a-pull-request-template). By making Forgejo also look there, it becomes possible to have the same repository work on both sites, without the need for vendor-specific paths.
There was duplication in the list of accepted file paths. On the one hand it’s nice for greppability that they are all spelled out, but it does mean adding 6 variants, I thought it would be more maintainable to deduplicate the Cartesian product. I added one fully spelled out path in the comment to still maintain some greppability.
Resolvesforgejo/forgejo#8284
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8863
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Ruud van Asseldonk <dev@veniogames.com>
Co-committed-by: Ruud van Asseldonk <dev@veniogames.com>
- gopkg.in/yaml.v3 is archived and unmaintained
- go.yaml.in/yaml/v3 is a compatible fork under the umbrella
of https://yaml.org/
### Tests
There is no need for more tests than already provided: it is like an upgrade to a minor version, only from a fork. I browsed the changes and there are some bug fixes. They all seem reasonably minimal. It is not one of those forks that went crazy with breaking changes 😁 And there is a non zero chance that [a bug that matters to Forgejo Actions](https://github.com/yaml/go-yaml/issues/76) is fixed there. It is rare and can wait but it did happen on Codeberg.
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8956
Reviewed-by: oliverpool <oliverpool@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Co-committed-by: Earl Warren <contact@earl-warren.org>
Currently the `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents` API endpoint accepts request without any `ChangeFileOperation.SHA`, unlike stated by the doc:
33eee199cf/modules/structs/repo_file.go (L80-L81)
This PR adds:
- some more (already passing) tests around this function
- a new (failing) test to show this wrong behavior
- a fix (note that this is a breaking change for clients exploiting this bug)
- an update for all the existing tests
<!--start release-notes-assistant-->
## Release notes
<!--URL:https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo-->
- Breaking bug fixes
- [PR](https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139): <!--number 8139 --><!--line 0 --><!--description QVBJOiBlbmZvcmNlIHNoYSByZXF1aXJlbWVudCBvbiBgUE9TVCAvcmVwb3Mve293bmVyfS97cmVwb30vY29udGVudHNg-->API: enforce sha requirement on `POST /repos/{owner}/{repo}/contents`<!--description-->
<!--end release-notes-assistant-->
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/8139
Reviewed-by: Gusted <gusted@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
Co-committed-by: oliverpool <git@olivier.pfad.fr>
More about codespell: https://github.com/codespell-project/codespell .
I personally introduced it to dozens if not hundreds of projects already and so far only positive feedback.
```
❯ grep lint-spell Makefile
@echo " - lint-spell lint spelling"
@echo " - lint-spell-fix lint spelling and fix issues"
lint: lint-frontend lint-backend lint-spell
lint-fix: lint-frontend-fix lint-backend-fix lint-spell-fix
.PHONY: lint-spell
lint-spell: lint-codespell
.PHONY: lint-spell-fix
lint-spell-fix: lint-codespell-fix
❯ git grep lint- -- .forgejo/
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make --always-make -j$(nproc) lint-backend checks-backend # ensure the "go-licenses" make target runs
.forgejo/workflows/testing.yml: - run: make lint-frontend
```
so how would you like me to invoke `lint-codespell` on CI? (without that would be IMHO very suboptimal and let typos sneak in)
Reviewed-on: https://codeberg.org/forgejo/forgejo/pulls/3270
Reviewed-by: Earl Warren <earl-warren@noreply.codeberg.org>
Co-authored-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
Co-committed-by: Yaroslav Halchenko <debian@onerussian.com>
This adds a few tests for the previous change, to verify that issue
template configs, issue templates and pr templates are all recognized in
`.forgejo` directories.
Signed-off-by: Gergely Nagy <forgejo@gergo.csillger.hu>
Blank Issues should be enabled if they are not explicit disabled through
the `blank_issues_enabled` field of the Issue Config. The Implementation
has currently a Bug: If you create a Issue Config file with only
`contact_links` and without a `blank_issues_enabled` field,
`blank_issues_enabled` is set to false by default.
The fix is only one line, but I decided to also improve the tests to
make sure there are no other problems with the Implementation.
This is a bugfix, so it should be backported to 1.20.
Closes#20955
This PR adds the possibility to disable blank Issues, when the Repo has
templates. This can be done by creating the file
`.gitea/issue_config.yaml` with the content `blank_issues_enabled` in
the Repo.
