name: Gitea Code Review
description: A GitHub Action that uses OpenAI to review code in pull request.
inputs:
  PROGRAMMING_LANGUAGE:
    description: 'The programming language used in the GitHub repository. If not provided, the detected programming language will be used.'
    default: ''
  FULL_REVIEW_COMMENT:
    description: 'The comment to trigger a code review for the pull request.'
    default: 'openai'
  REVIEW_COMMENT_PREFIX:
    description: 'The comment prefix to trigger a code review with the comment content.'
    default: 'openai:'
  OPENAI_TOKEN:
    description: 'The API token for the OpenAI API.'
    required: true
  GITHUB_TOKEN:
    description: 'The API token for the Github API.'
    required: true
  GITHUB_BASE_URL:
    description: 'The base URL for the GitHub API.'
  MAX_CODE_LENGTH:
    description: 'The maximum code length for the pull request to be sent to OpenAI.'
    default: 6000
    type: int
  SOURCE_AT:
    description: 'Where is the source code located'
    default: 'github'
  PROMPT_TEMPLATE:
    description: 'The template for the FULL_REVIEW_COMMENT prompt.'
    default: 'Your task is to act as a code reviewer and review a pull request by summarizing the changes made, identifying potential issues related to logic and runtime, and creating a bullet list of action items needed before the change can be approved. The output should focus on items mentioned in the given code review checklist.
    Instructions:
    - Review the output of git diff for the pull request
    - Summarize the overview of the changes made
    - Identify potential issues related to logic and runtime
    - Output as a markdown document, with the following sections:
        #### Overview of changes:
          - Summarize the overview of the changes made
        #### issues:
          - Identify potential issues related to logic and runtime
          - Identify issues mentioned in the code review checklist
        #### Action items:
          - Action items needed before the change can be approved
    - If there are no issues, output "None"
    - If there are no action items, output "None"
    - Create a bullet list of action items needed before the change can be approved
    - The response sentences are no longer than 16 words each
    - Keep the response sentences as short as possible
    - Focus on items mentioned in the given code review checklist:
        Code Structure
          - Is the codebase organized according to Laravel Framework recommended project structure?
          - Are there any unnecessary files, folders, or code modules?
          - Does the code follow the Single Responsibility Principle (SRP) and Dont Repeat Yourself (DRY) principle?
        Error Handling
          - Are all error scenarios covered in the code?
          - Are the error messages clear and helpful?
          - Is the code handling errors gracefully?
        Security
          - Are sensitive data and credentials stored securely?
          - Are all external libraries and packages up-to-date?
          - Is the code protected against common security vulnerabilities such as SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS)?
        
\`\`\`
${code}
\`\`\`'

  ANSWER_TEMPLATE:
    description: 'The template for the answer sent to the GitHub comment.'
    default: 'AI Code Review:
=======
### Summary:

${answer}'
runs:
  using: 'node16'
  main: 'dist/index.js'