Fix fail-on-cache-miss not working

This commit is contained in:
Marc Mueller 2024-02-15 21:58:25 +01:00
parent ab5e6d0c87
commit e29dad3e36
3 changed files with 16 additions and 29 deletions

@ -59392,7 +59392,7 @@ const core = __importStar(__nccwpck_require__(2186));
const constants_1 = __nccwpck_require__(9042);
const stateProvider_1 = __nccwpck_require__(1527);
const utils = __importStar(__nccwpck_require__(6850));
function restoreImpl(stateProvider) {
function restoreImpl(stateProvider, earlyExit) {
return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
try {
if (!utils.isCacheFeatureAvailable()) {
@ -59438,21 +59438,16 @@ function restoreImpl(stateProvider) {
}
catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error.message);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
});
}
exports.restoreImpl = restoreImpl;
function run(stateProvider, earlyExit) {
return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
try {
yield restoreImpl(stateProvider);
}
catch (err) {
console.error(err);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
yield restoreImpl(stateProvider, earlyExit);
// node will stay alive if any promises are not resolved,
// which is a possibility if HTTP requests are dangling
// due to retries or timeouts. We know that if we got here

15
dist/restore/index.js vendored

@ -59392,7 +59392,7 @@ const core = __importStar(__nccwpck_require__(2186));
const constants_1 = __nccwpck_require__(9042);
const stateProvider_1 = __nccwpck_require__(1527);
const utils = __importStar(__nccwpck_require__(6850));
function restoreImpl(stateProvider) {
function restoreImpl(stateProvider, earlyExit) {
return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
try {
if (!utils.isCacheFeatureAvailable()) {
@ -59438,21 +59438,16 @@ function restoreImpl(stateProvider) {
}
catch (error) {
core.setFailed(error.message);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
});
}
exports.restoreImpl = restoreImpl;
function run(stateProvider, earlyExit) {
return __awaiter(this, void 0, void 0, function* () {
try {
yield restoreImpl(stateProvider);
}
catch (err) {
console.error(err);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
yield restoreImpl(stateProvider, earlyExit);
// node will stay alive if any promises are not resolved,
// which is a possibility if HTTP requests are dangling
// due to retries or timeouts. We know that if we got here

@ -10,7 +10,8 @@ import {
import * as utils from "./utils/actionUtils";
export async function restoreImpl(
stateProvider: IStateProvider
stateProvider: IStateProvider,
earlyExit?: boolean | undefined
): Promise<string | undefined> {
try {
if (!utils.isCacheFeatureAvailable()) {
@ -83,6 +84,9 @@ export async function restoreImpl(
return cacheKey;
} catch (error: unknown) {
core.setFailed((error as Error).message);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
}
@ -90,14 +94,7 @@ async function run(
stateProvider: IStateProvider,
earlyExit: boolean | undefined
): Promise<void> {
try {
await restoreImpl(stateProvider);
} catch (err) {
console.error(err);
if (earlyExit) {
process.exit(1);
}
}
await restoreImpl(stateProvider, earlyExit);
// node will stay alive if any promises are not resolved,
// which is a possibility if HTTP requests are dangling